Unit 4: Social Psychology

This unit explores how people think about, influence, and relate to one another. Topics include attribution, person perception, social influence, conformity, obedience, persuasion, group dynamics, and prosocial behavior.

Attribution Theory and Person Perception

Attribution theory examines how we explain behavior, both our own and others'. Understanding attributions and biases helps us navigate social interactions more effectively.

Internal vs. External Attributions

Dispositional (internal) attribution: Linking behavior to personality traits or intelligence.
Example: “He failed because he’s lazy.”

Situational (external) attribution: Linking behavior to environmental circumstances.
Example: “He failed because the test was unfair.”

Common Attribution Biases

Fundamental Attribution Error: Overestimating dispositional factors and underestimating situational ones when judging others’ behavior.

Actor-Observer Bias: Attributing our own behavior to situations, but others’ behavior to their dispositions.

Self-Serving Bias: Taking credit for successes (internal attribution) but blaming failures on external factors.

Locus of Control

The degree to which people believe they control life outcomes.

Internal locus: Outcomes result from one’s own actions → linked to motivation and resilience.

External locus: Outcomes controlled by luck, fate, or others → linked to helplessness.

Application Example:
Two students fail a test:
Internal locus: “I’ll study harder next time.”
External locus: “The teacher made it impossible.”

Mere Exposure Effect

People develop preferences simply from repeated exposure to stimuli.

Example 1: Liking a song more after hearing it multiple times.

Example 2: Preferring a brand after frequent advertisements.

Self-Fulfilling Prophecies

Beliefs lead to behaviors that confirm those beliefs.

Example 1: A teacher expects poor performance → gives less support → student underperforms.

Example 2: Believing you are socially awkward → act withdrawn → others avoid → reinforces belief.

Social Comparison

Evaluating oneself against others.

Upward comparison: Compare to someone “better off” → can inspire but also lower self-esteem.

Downward comparison: Compare to someone “worse off” → can boost self-esteem but lower motivation.

Relative Deprivation: Feeling worse off after comparing to others, even without absolute deprivation.

Attitude Formation and Change

Our attitudes and stereotypes shape behavior and can be resistant to change.

Stereotypes and Implicit Attitudes

Stereotypes: Oversimplified beliefs about groups → reduce cognitive load but can fuel prejudice.

Implicit Attitudes: Unconscious attitudes that affect behavior without awareness.

Related Concepts

Belief Perseverance: Clinging to beliefs despite contradictory evidence.

Cognitive Dissonance: Discomfort from holding conflicting beliefs/actions → motivates attitude change to restore consistency.

Social Influence and Conformity

Conformity: Adjusting behavior/thinking to match group standards (Asch conformity experiment).

Obedience: Following authority figures (Milgram shock experiment).

Deindividuation: Loss of self-awareness/restraint in groups (e.g., riots).

Social Facilitation: Improved performance on easy tasks in presence of others; worse on difficult tasks.

Social Loafing: People exert less effort in groups than alone.

Group Dynamics

Groupthink: Desire for harmony overrides realistic decision-making (Janis).

Group Polarization: Discussion strengthens the group’s prevailing opinions.

Stanford Prison Experiment (Zimbardo): Showed power of social roles and authority in shaping behavior.

Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior

Bystander Effect: Less likely to help when others are present (Darley & Latané).

Diffusion of Responsibility: Individuals feel less personally responsible in groups.

Altruism: Helping others without expecting reward.

Persuasion

Central Route Persuasion: Persuasion via logic, evidence, and arguments.

Peripheral Route Persuasion: Persuasion via superficial cues (attractiveness, celebrity endorsements).

Obedience and Authority

Milgram’s Obedience Experiment (1960s): Participants were instructed to administer electric shocks to a learner for wrong answers. Many continued to high shock levels despite distress, showing the power of authority.

  • 65% of participants administered the maximum shock.
  • Conclusion: Ordinary people are capable of following authority even when harming others.
  • Ethical concerns: Deception, stress, and lack of informed consent.

Conformity Studies

Asch Conformity Experiment (1950s): Participants judged line lengths. Confederates gave wrong answers, and many participants conformed to the group’s incorrect choice.

  • About 75% conformed at least once.
  • Demonstrates normative social influence (conforming to be liked/accepted).
  • Also linked to informational social influence (conforming because group may be right).

Types of Social Influence

Normative Social Influence: Conforming to gain approval or avoid disapproval.

Informational Social Influence: Conforming because we believe others have accurate information.

Compliance: Changing behavior when requested by others, even without authority.

Obedience: Following direct orders from an authority figure.

Prejudice, Discrimination, and In-Group Bias

Prejudice: Unjustifiable attitude toward a group and its members (often negative).

Discrimination: Unjustifiable negative behavior toward a group and its members.

In-Group Bias: Favoring one’s own group (in-group) over others (out-group).

Out-Group Homogeneity Effect: Belief that out-group members are all the same.

Scapegoat Theory: Blaming a group for problems to reduce frustration.

Just-World Phenomenon: Belief that people get what they deserve (“blaming the victim”).

Aggression

Aggression: Behavior intended to harm someone physically or emotionally.

Biological influences: Genetics, brain structures (amygdala), hormones (testosterone).

Psychological influences: Frustration-aggression principle (frustration creates anger, leading to aggression).

Social-cultural influences: Exposure to violent media, cultural norms encouraging aggression.

Attraction and Relationships

Proximity: Geographic closeness increases attraction (mere exposure effect).

Physical Attractiveness: Strong predictor of dating choices; associated with positive social perceptions.

Similarity: People are more likely to be attracted to those with similar attitudes, interests, and values.

Companionate Love: Deep affectionate attachment built over time.

Passionate Love: Intense, arousing form of love, usually early in relationships.

Helping Behavior

Bystander Effect: Tendency for bystanders to be less likely to help if others are present.

  • Diffusion of Responsibility: More people → less personal responsibility felt.
  • Conditions that increase helping: Small towns, feeling guilty, being in a good mood, seeing someone else help.

Persuasion Techniques

Foot-in-the-Door Phenomenon: People who first agree to a small request are more likely to later comply with a larger one.

Door-in-the-Face Technique: People are more likely to agree to a small request after refusing a large one.